 |

Arizona DUI Attorneys- Arizona Drunk Driving Lawyers - Arizona DWI Attorneys
Contact Edward Loss III Scottsdale Arizona DUI Attorney
Defending Arizona DUI Arrests throughout Scottsdale AZ and Surrounding Communities
1-800-DIAL-DUI or 1-800-342-5384 (area code 480)
There's a reason that Arizona DUI Attorney Lawyer Ed Loss III is a Member of America's Top DUI & DWI Defense Attorneys TM :
Edward Loss Wins Arizona DUI Cases
CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI (Areas 480) NOW TO TALK TO SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS
OR Click Here to Contact ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS:

Serving: Apache Jct., Carefree, Cave Creek, Chandler, Fountain Hills, Gilbert, Guadalupe, Higley, Mesa, Paradise Valley, Queen Creek, Salt River, Scottsdale, Sun Lakes, most of Tempe; east/northeast Phoenix area
Read Arizona DUI Lawyer Ed Loss' Answers About Arizona DUI Laws
Simply speaking, yes. I can review every aspect of the case, from the reason that you were stopped, to the validity of the field sobriety tests, to the maintenance of the breathalyzer machine, to the validity of the results. I will conduct a thorough review of all the facts and laws regarding your Arizona DUI case.
Also, I will discuss the case with the prosecutor and judge, pointing out your background, your job, and the need for you to keep your license.
The following is a list of symptoms in descending order of probability that the person observed is driving while intoxicated . The list is based upon research conducted by the National Highway Traffic Administration:
(1) Turning with a wide radius
(2) Straddling center of lane marker
(3) "Appearing to be drunk"
(4) Almost striking object or vehicle
(5) Weaving
(6) Driving on other than designated highway
(7) Swerving
(8) Speed more than 10 mph below limit
(9) Stopping without cause in traffic lane
(10) Following too closely
(11) Drifting
(12) Tires on center or lane marker
(13) Braking erratically
(14) Driving into opposing or crossing traffic
(15) Signaling inconsistent with driving actions
(16) Slow response to traffic signals
(17) Stopping inappropriately (other than in lane)
(18) Turning abruptly or illegally
(19) Accelerating or decelerating rapidly
(20) Headlights off
Speeding, incidentally, is not a symptom of DUI; because of quicker judgment and reflexes, it may indicate sobriety.
Back to Top
-
2. In Arizona, if I'm stopped by a police officer and he asks me if I've been drinking, what should I say ?
-
In Arizona, you are not required to answer potentially incriminating questions. A polite "I would like to speak with an attorney before I answer any questions" is a good reply. On the other hand, saying that you had one or two beers is not incriminating: it is not sufficient to cause legal intoxication -- and it may explain the odor of alcohol on the breath. However, it is not advisable to admit to any type of drinking. The reason for this is that once you make this admission the chances are the police officer is eventually going to arrest you for DUI . The Arizona law forbids impairment to any or slightest degree. If you have consumed two beers, and it has had an affect on you ,and the prosecutor is able to prove it you could be convicted of DUI.
Back to Top
CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI (Areas 480 ) NOW TO TALK TO SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS
OR Click Here to Contact SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS:
-
3. Do I have a right to an attorney when I'm stopped by an officer and asked to take a field sobriety test ?
-
In Arizona, you do not have the right to consult with an attorney prior to taking field sobriety tests. FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS ARE VOLUNTARY. This means you don't have to take them. As a general rule DO NOT take any field sobriety tests, ever, for any reason, even if the police officer says he just wants to see if you are ok to drive. That is generally B.S. What he is really doing is looking to arrest you but cannot do so unless he has some evidence that you are DUI. If the officer says that he will take you to jail if you refuse to take the field sobriety tests, hold out your hands for the handcuffs and tell the officer "Let's go". The field sobriety tests include the "eye-test" (HGN); the Walk and Turn test; and the One Leg Stand test.
Back to Top
-
4. What is the officer looking for during the initial detention at the scene ?
-
The traditional symptoms of intoxication taught at the police academies are:
(1) Flushed face
(2) Red, watery, glassy and/or bloodshot eyes
(3) Odor of alcohol on breath
(4) Slurred speech
(5) Fumbling with wallet trying to get license
(6) Failure to comprehend the officer's questions
(7) Staggering when exiting vehicle
(8) Swaying/instability on feet
(9) Leaning on car for support
(10) Combative, argumentative, jovial or other "inappropriate" attitude
(11) Soiled, rumpled, disorderly clothing
(12) Stumbling while walking
(13) Disorientation as to time and place
(14) Inability to follow directions
Back to Top
-
5. What should I do if I'm asked to take field sobriety tests ?
-
JUST SAY NO!. See number No. 3 Above.
-
There are a wide range of field sobriety tests (FSTs), including heel-to-toe, finger-to-nose, one-leg stand, horizontal gaze nystagmus, alphabet recitation, modified position of attention (Rhomberg), fingers-to-thumb, hand pat, etc. Most officers will use a set battery of three to five such tests.
-
Unlike the chemical test, where refusal to submit may have serious consequences, you are not legally required to take any FSTs. The reality is that officers have usually made up their minds to arrest when they give the FSTs; the tests are simply additional evidence which the suspect inevitably "fails". Thus, in most cases a polite refusal may be appropriate.
Back to Top
CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI (Areas 480 ) NOW TO TALK TO SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS
OR Click Here to Contact SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS:

-
6. Why did the officer make me follow a penlight with my eyes to the left and right ?
-
This is the " horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN)" test, a relatively recent development in DUI investigation. The officer attempts to estimate the angle at which the eye begins to jerk ("nystagmus " is medical jargon for a distinctive eye oscillation); if this occurs sooner than 45 degrees, it theoretically indicates a blood-alcohol concentration over .05%. The smoothness of the eye's tracking the penlight (or finger or pencil) is also a factor, as is the type of jerking when the eye is as far to the side as it can go.
-
This field sobriety test has proven to be subject to a number of different problems, not the least of which is the non-medically trained officer's ability to recognize nystagmus and estimate the angle of onset. The HGN test is admissible in Arizona only to prove possible impairment of which once source could be alcohol.
Back to Top
-
7. Should I agree to take a chemical test? What happens if I don't ?
-
In Arizona, the consequences of refusing to submit to a blood, breath or urine test are:
-
(1) In Arizona, your driver's license will be suspended for twelve (12) months. This may be true even if you are found not guilty of the DUI charge.
-
(2) In Arizona, a refusal is not a separate crime in an of itself. Prosecutors and judges sometimes look at refusal cases in the light that you BAC was really high, which was the reason for the refusal.
-
(3) In Arizona, the fact of refusal can be introduced into evidence as "consciousness of guilt". Of course, the defense is free to offer other reasons for the refusal.
-
Thus, the decision is one of weighing the likelihood of a high blood-alcohol reading against the consequences for refusing. Please see " What is Implied Consent" for more information.
Back to Top
-
8. Do I have a choice of chemical tests? Which should I choose ?
-
In Arizona, you have no choice. The police officer decides which test to give you. What test is given is in large part dependent on the police department and their policies. For example, the Tucson Police Department generally uses a breath test. However, sometimes they will have a "trained" police officer to take blood. The Oro Valley, Arizona Police use exclusively blood tests.
-
Also, the test given is dependent on the circumstances of the case. For example if there was an vehicle accident with bodily injury, the police would ask for a blood test.
-
Analysis of a blood sample is potentially the most accurate. Breath machines are susceptible to a number of problems rendering them often unreliable. The least accurate by far, however, is urinalysis.
Back to Top
CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI (Areas 480 ) NOW TO TALK TO SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS
OR Click Here to Contact SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS:

-
9. The officer never gave me a "Miranda" warning: Can I get my case dismissed ?
-
No. The officer is supposed to give a 5th Amendment warning, your "Miranda" rights, after he arrests you. Often, however, they do not. The only consequence is that the prosecution cannot use any of your answers to questions asked by the police after the arrest.
-
Of more consequence in most cases is the failure to advise you of the state's " implied consent" law - that is, your legal obligation to take a chemical test and the results if you refuse. This can effect the suspension of your license.
Back to Top
CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI (Areas 480 ) NOW TO TALK TO SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS
OR Click Here to Contact SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS:

-
16. What is a sentence "enhancement" ?
-
Most states increase the punishment in drunk driving cases if certain facts exist. The most common of these is an earlier conviction for the same or a similar offense -- usually within five or seven years of the current offense. Other commonly encountered enhancements (which must usually be alleged in the complaint) include:
-
(1) A child was in the car at the time.
-
(2) The defendant was traveling 20 or 30 miles over the speed limit at the time.
-
(3) The blood-alcohol concentration was over .20%.
-
(4) The defendant refused to submit to a chemical test.
-
(5) There was property damage or injury.
-
(6) The defendant was under 21 ("zero tolerance" laws commonly require a much lower blood - alcohol level, and impose longer license suspensions).
-
In most states, the existence of any personal injury caused by drunk driving elevates the offense to a felony. A death can trigger manslaughter or even, in a few states, murder charges.
Back to Top
CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI (Areas 480 ) NOW TO TALK TO SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS
OR Click Here to Contact SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS:

-
19. What defenses are there in a DUI case ?
-
Potential defenses in a given drunk driving case are almost limitless due to the complexities of the offense. Roughly speaking, however, the majority can be broken down into the following areas:
-
(1) Driving. Intoxication is not enough: the prosecution must also prove that the defendant was driving. This may be difficult if, as in the case of accidents, there are no witnesses to his being the driver of the vehicle.
-
(2) Probable cause. Evidence will be suppressed if the officer did not have legal cause to (a) stop, (b) detain, and (c) arrest. Sobriety roadblocks present particularly complex issues.
-
(3) Miranda. Incriminating statements may be suppressed if warnings were not given at the appropriate time.
-
(4) Implied consent warnings. If the officer did not advise you of the consequences of refusing to take a chemical test, or gave it incorrectly, in some states this may affect admissibility of the test results -- as well as the license suspension imposed by the motor vehicle department.
-
(5) "Under the influence". The officer's observations and opinions as to intoxication can be questioned -- the circumstances under which the field sobriety tests were given, for example, or the subjective (and predisposed) nature of what the officer considers as "failing". Too, witnesses can testify that you appeared to be sober.
-
(6) Blood-alcohol concentration. There exists a wide range of potential problems with blood, breath or urine testing. "Non-specific" analysis, for example: most breath machines will register many chemical compounds found on the human breath as alcohol. And breath machines assume a 2100-to-1 ratio in converting alcohol in the breath into alcohol in the blood; in fact, this ratio varies widely from person to person (and within a person from one moment to another). Radio frequency interference can result in inaccurate readings. These and other defects in analysis can be brought out in cross-examination of the state's expert witness, and/or the defense can hire its own forensic chemist.
-
(7) Testing during the absorptive phase. The blood, breath or urine test will be unreliable if done while you are still actively absorbing alcohol (it takes 30 minutes to three hours to complete absorption; this can be delayed if food is present in the stomach). Thus, drinking "one for the road" can cause inaccurate test results.
-
(8) Retrograde extrapolation. This refers to the requirement that the BAC be "related back" in time from the test to the driving (see question #17). Again, a number of complex physiological problems are involved here.
-
(9) Regulation of blood-alcohol testing. The prosecution must prove that the blood, breath or urine test complied with state requirements as to calibration, maintenance, etc.
(10) License suspension hearings. A number of issues can be raised in the context of an administrative hearing before the state's department of motor vehicles.
Back to Top
CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI (Areas 480 ) NOW TO TALK TO SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS
OR Click Here to Contact SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY ED LOSS:

|
 |




|